<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for I E B A  Tech  Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ieba.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Anthony's News, Reviews &#38; Perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Please use &#8220;Over-Under&#8221; when wrapping cables. by Jens Fiederer</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/please-use-over-under-when-wrapping-cables/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens Fiederer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/please-use-over-under-when-wrapping-cables/#comment-332</guid>
		<description>This looks very useful....but why do it in green-black on dark-gray?  It is impossible for me to read in either IE or Firefox without selecting the text first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks very useful&#8230;.but why do it in green-black on dark-gray?  It is impossible for me to read in either IE or Firefox without selecting the text first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Please use &#8220;Over-Under&#8221; when wrapping cables. by Jon</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/please-use-over-under-when-wrapping-cables/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 05:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/please-use-over-under-when-wrapping-cables/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s interesting, never really thought about the science behind wrapping cables. When I wrap shorter cables I just fold them in half a couple of times until I reach the desired length as show in the post &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.optimiz3.com/neatly-store-cables-and-wires/&quot; title=&quot;Store Cables and Wires&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Store Cables and Wires&lt;/a&gt;&quot;. I wonder if that has an adverse effect on the life of cables and wires?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting, never really thought about the science behind wrapping cables. When I wrap shorter cables I just fold them in half a couple of times until I reach the desired length as show in the post &#8220;<a href="http://www.optimiz3.com/neatly-store-cables-and-wires/" title="Store Cables and Wires" rel="nofollow">Store Cables and Wires</a>&#8220;. I wonder if that has an adverse effect on the life of cables and wires?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flash Hard Drives (SSD) are they worth it? by Wilko</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/flash-hard-drives-ssd-are-they-worth-it/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/flash-hard-drives-ssd-are-they-worth-it/#comment-328</guid>
		<description>And now it is 2009 and SSD&#039;s have gotten even better. However, the price per GB/s is still an issue and until the price lowers further I am spending my money on HDD. In most consumer based situations the &#039;rugged&#039; and durability or SSD are useless and do not really offer much in practicality. Laptops it may be a different story, but the standard casual user finding a use in a computer case? 

Durability does come in handy if the user was to say, use the SSD as a portable Storage solution. One SSD I have inspected had a connection beside the SATA connectors in which you could use the standard USB cable that many Portable HDD use. You wouldn&#039;t have to be worried about such problems as dropping it as much but then comes the loss, speed. I believe the speed of the drive would suffer through the transfer rate of the USB 2.0. Perhaps however if the drives were to incorporate USB 3.0 in the future then that would definitely make a difference. 

I think that in most cases these SSD drives are still not worth the cost for the results that they have shown but in the future they will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now it is 2009 and SSD&#8217;s have gotten even better. However, the price per GB/s is still an issue and until the price lowers further I am spending my money on HDD. In most consumer based situations the &#8216;rugged&#8217; and durability or SSD are useless and do not really offer much in practicality. Laptops it may be a different story, but the standard casual user finding a use in a computer case? </p>
<p>Durability does come in handy if the user was to say, use the SSD as a portable Storage solution. One SSD I have inspected had a connection beside the SATA connectors in which you could use the standard USB cable that many Portable HDD use. You wouldn&#8217;t have to be worried about such problems as dropping it as much but then comes the loss, speed. I believe the speed of the drive would suffer through the transfer rate of the USB 2.0. Perhaps however if the drives were to incorporate USB 3.0 in the future then that would definitely make a difference. </p>
<p>I think that in most cases these SSD drives are still not worth the cost for the results that they have shown but in the future they will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rolling shutter? &#8211; Pick the right tool for the job. by Gabriel Soares</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/rolling-shutter-pick-the-right-tool-for-the-job/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Soares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/rolling-shutter-pick-the-right-tool-for-the-job/#comment-323</guid>
		<description>The rolling shutter is not a problem at all. The problem is the read-reset time. If the read-reset time is fast enough, there will be no noticeable distortion on the image.

 But today, most of the CMOS have lazy read-reset times, generating a reasonably amount of distortion.

 And the film cameras already have some kind of &quot;rolling shutter&quot;. The rotative shutter exposes the frame progressively, like the rolling shutter of the CMOS. See this animation: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/Moviecam_schematic_animation.gif.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rolling shutter is not a problem at all. The problem is the read-reset time. If the read-reset time is fast enough, there will be no noticeable distortion on the image.</p>
<p> But today, most of the CMOS have lazy read-reset times, generating a reasonably amount of distortion.</p>
<p> And the film cameras already have some kind of &#8220;rolling shutter&#8221;. The rotative shutter exposes the frame progressively, like the rolling shutter of the CMOS. See this animation: <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/Moviecam_schematic_animation.gif" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/Moviecam_schematic_animation.gif</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hard Drive as floppy disk. Now for just $47. by Piyush</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/hard-drive-as-floppy-disk-now-for-just-47/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Piyush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/hard-drive-as-floppy-disk-now-for-just-47/#comment-317</guid>
		<description>I have device which uses floppy drive as data storage memory for saving data.which encode &amp; decode the signals. but the problem is the floppies get bad often.so I want to change the storage device as usb hard disk.If usb hard disk work in place of floppy drive.Remember the motherboard of the device can except only floppy drive bus(no hdd bus,no usb).so I need some arrangement which encode &amp; decode signals from hard disk to floppy drive port on motherboard.If some dongle in the path of the whole transaction.
      Please inform me if you have any idea or any solution for my problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have device which uses floppy drive as data storage memory for saving data.which encode &amp; decode the signals. but the problem is the floppies get bad often.so I want to change the storage device as usb hard disk.If usb hard disk work in place of floppy drive.Remember the motherboard of the device can except only floppy drive bus(no hdd bus,no usb).so I need some arrangement which encode &amp; decode signals from hard disk to floppy drive port on motherboard.If some dongle in the path of the whole transaction.<br />
      Please inform me if you have any idea or any solution for my problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Panny&#8217;s new AJ-HPX3000 P2 versus RED-1. by Alias</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/pannys-new-aj-hpx3000-p2-versus-red-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Alias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/pannys-new-aj-hpx3000-p2-versus-red-1/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Agree with you Jon. The initial review is hardly comparing apples and apples. A fully blown, ready to roll RED system will be around the $50-$60k US mark. If you want to add some high end glass to that, add another $50k. Red hard drives are fine, unless you are working in areas of live music production or shooting gunfire scenes or airplane landings, and then the air compression messes with the hard drive spindles causing dropped frames. Compact Flash is the only truly reliable medium at this stage. I have no doubt that once it comes of age, RED will be the giant slayer of our time, but for off the shelf, ready to go... right now it&#039;s the Panasonic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with you Jon. The initial review is hardly comparing apples and apples. A fully blown, ready to roll RED system will be around the $50-$60k US mark. If you want to add some high end glass to that, add another $50k. Red hard drives are fine, unless you are working in areas of live music production or shooting gunfire scenes or airplane landings, and then the air compression messes with the hard drive spindles causing dropped frames. Compact Flash is the only truly reliable medium at this stage. I have no doubt that once it comes of age, RED will be the giant slayer of our time, but for off the shelf, ready to go&#8230; right now it&#8217;s the Panasonic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flash Hard Drives (SSD) are they worth it? by Jeff C</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/flash-hard-drives-ssd-are-they-worth-it/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/flash-hard-drives-ssd-are-they-worth-it/#comment-312</guid>
		<description>On commercial camcorders I totally agree, ... hard drives are the way to go.  (So long as the microphone is an &quot;off-shoe.&quot;) 

For consumer camcorders, it makes perfect sense to use flash memory.  Consumer camcorders are very compact, which means that even the smallest amount of noise from a hard drive or tape drive is picked up by the camera&#039;s internal microphone.  Not to mention ground loop issues, etc..  Flash based camcorders have no moving parts (except zoom/focus) which means no noise for the microphone to pick up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On commercial camcorders I totally agree, &#8230; hard drives are the way to go.  (So long as the microphone is an &#8220;off-shoe.&#8221;) </p>
<p>For consumer camcorders, it makes perfect sense to use flash memory.  Consumer camcorders are very compact, which means that even the smallest amount of noise from a hard drive or tape drive is picked up by the camera&#8217;s internal microphone.  Not to mention ground loop issues, etc..  Flash based camcorders have no moving parts (except zoom/focus) which means no noise for the microphone to pick up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flash Hard Drives (SSD) are they worth it? by Jeff C</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/flash-hard-drives-ssd-are-they-worth-it/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/flash-hard-drives-ssd-are-they-worth-it/#comment-311</guid>
		<description>Only a year later, and SSD&#039;s have greatly surpassed the speed and seek potential of platter drives...

The drives tested above came in around 60-65MB/sec sustained.  SSD&#039;s are now capable of almost THREE times that.  :)  And the price is quickly on it&#039;s way to the area you specified.  (Currently $300 for 128GB (MLC) OCZ w/ 140MB/s sustained read and 90MB/s sustained write.  And it&#039;s only going to get better..)

Like any other technology, upon first release it is going to be fairly expensive, but as it becomes more mainstream, the cost to manufacture decreases allowing for cheaper retail cost.

Also, ... had they strapped a couple of magnetic drives to his hip it would have been a much different story.  I believe given the choice between the ruggedness of an SSD (Very easy to make waterproof, too...) or the Capacity of a platter disk, Hurley would have chosen the SSD.  The US Military has been using SSD&#039;s for MANY YEARS (at costs in the $5-50k/each range, no less) ... for a reason...  :)

Also, because Hurley was known for using &quot;average&quot; equipment, you might be suprised...  If digital had been available in his time, and it was considered as &quot;average&quot; as it is today, ... maybe he&#039;d have been using digital equipment.  

The fact that old people refuse to go digital, using every excuse possible doesn&#039;t make digital bad...  (Example : Saying - &quot;It just doesn&#039;t look as good.&quot;  Which I tested a few years back by puting a digital print and a print from a 35mm in front of a career photographer (and a good friend that is in his 60&#039;s) who still won&#039;t buy digital, and he couldn&#039;t tell me which of the two was from 35mm without looking at the back of the stock.....)  These are the same people that think we should go back to 33 and 45 records...  Really????  C&#039;mon!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only a year later, and SSD&#8217;s have greatly surpassed the speed and seek potential of platter drives&#8230;</p>
<p>The drives tested above came in around 60-65MB/sec sustained.  SSD&#8217;s are now capable of almost THREE times that.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   And the price is quickly on it&#8217;s way to the area you specified.  (Currently $300 for 128GB (MLC) OCZ w/ 140MB/s sustained read and 90MB/s sustained write.  And it&#8217;s only going to get better..)</p>
<p>Like any other technology, upon first release it is going to be fairly expensive, but as it becomes more mainstream, the cost to manufacture decreases allowing for cheaper retail cost.</p>
<p>Also, &#8230; had they strapped a couple of magnetic drives to his hip it would have been a much different story.  I believe given the choice between the ruggedness of an SSD (Very easy to make waterproof, too&#8230;) or the Capacity of a platter disk, Hurley would have chosen the SSD.  The US Military has been using SSD&#8217;s for MANY YEARS (at costs in the $5-50k/each range, no less) &#8230; for a reason&#8230;  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Also, because Hurley was known for using &#8220;average&#8221; equipment, you might be suprised&#8230;  If digital had been available in his time, and it was considered as &#8220;average&#8221; as it is today, &#8230; maybe he&#8217;d have been using digital equipment.  </p>
<p>The fact that old people refuse to go digital, using every excuse possible doesn&#8217;t make digital bad&#8230;  (Example : Saying &#8211; &#8220;It just doesn&#8217;t look as good.&#8221;  Which I tested a few years back by puting a digital print and a print from a 35mm in front of a career photographer (and a good friend that is in his 60&#8217;s) who still won&#8217;t buy digital, and he couldn&#8217;t tell me which of the two was from 35mm without looking at the back of the stock&#8230;..)  These are the same people that think we should go back to 33 and 45 records&#8230;  Really????  C&#8217;mon!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IEBA Presents: Sony Seminar: HVR-S270, HVR-Z7U by Mark Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/ieba-presents-sony-seminar-hvr-s270-hvr-z7u/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Goldberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/ieba-presents-sony-seminar-hvr-s270-hvr-z7u/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>I was at this seminar.  I also attended Sony&#039;s demo of the EX1 on the show floor.  I admire and praise Sony for expanding its offerings of affordable HD production instruments, ranging from their HDR (?) 1000 shoulderable single-chip prosumer model.

I briefly mentioned to Juan, and will expand here, the need for one more entry - a new camera to replace the date HVR-A1 design.  It is a small, under 2 lb camera great for POV, backup, and other applications where a small inconspicuous camera is needed.  If Sony could re-engineer and update their classic DCR-TRV-900 DV camera design for the HD world, that would be perfect.  If such a cmaera is built with an AVCHD (h.264 / mp4) recording format, hopefully it will be at an encoding rate of 35 mbps or higher.

Considering the EX1 and the Z7, these are excellent cameras technically. The challenge is ergononmics.  I think they have gone over the line as far as being comfortably hand holdable for any length of time.  It would not take much to make them shoulderable, and I am not talking about the Z270 or the EX3.  All that would be needed would be a viewfinder hood/magnifier and forward handle extension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at this seminar.  I also attended Sony&#8217;s demo of the EX1 on the show floor.  I admire and praise Sony for expanding its offerings of affordable HD production instruments, ranging from their HDR (?) 1000 shoulderable single-chip prosumer model.</p>
<p>I briefly mentioned to Juan, and will expand here, the need for one more entry &#8211; a new camera to replace the date HVR-A1 design.  It is a small, under 2 lb camera great for POV, backup, and other applications where a small inconspicuous camera is needed.  If Sony could re-engineer and update their classic DCR-TRV-900 DV camera design for the HD world, that would be perfect.  If such a cmaera is built with an AVCHD (h.264 / mp4) recording format, hopefully it will be at an encoding rate of 35 mbps or higher.</p>
<p>Considering the EX1 and the Z7, these are excellent cameras technically. The challenge is ergononmics.  I think they have gone over the line as far as being comfortably hand holdable for any length of time.  It would not take much to make them shoulderable, and I am not talking about the Z270 or the EX3.  All that would be needed would be a viewfinder hood/magnifier and forward handle extension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony&#8217;s HD1000u Interesting, but lacking. by couryhouse</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/sonys-hd1000u-interesting-but-lacking/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>couryhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 05:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/sonys-hd1000u-interesting-but-lacking/#comment-304</guid>
		<description>HD1000u
need more reports  leave me mail at  www.glendaledailyplanet.com I very seldom get back to the same place here.

We are looking to  use these  for video journalism

how  good is the   infra red?

thanks Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HD1000u<br />
need more reports  leave me mail at  <a href="http://www.glendaledailyplanet.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.glendaledailyplanet.com</a> I very seldom get back to the same place here.</p>
<p>We are looking to  use these  for video journalism</p>
<p>how  good is the   infra red?</p>
<p>thanks Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
