<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Specs lie. (Actually they just mislead us.)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/specs-lie-actually-they-just-mislead-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/specs-lie-actually-they-just-mislead-us/</link>
	<description>Anthony's News, Reviews &#38; Perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Smacking Down Specs at FreshDV</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/specs-lie-actually-they-just-mislead-us/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Smacking Down Specs at FreshDV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/specs-lie-actually-they-just-mislead-us/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>[...] based purely on specs. It&#8217;s important to remind yourself from time to time that &#8220;specs lie&#8220;, and the proof is in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] based purely on specs. It&#8217;s important to remind yourself from time to time that &#8220;specs lie&#8220;, and the proof is in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ieba</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/specs-lie-actually-they-just-mislead-us/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>ieba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/specs-lie-actually-they-just-mislead-us/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Insightful as always, Philip.

Oversampling is indeed useful. However, All the camcorder manufacturers have demonstrated how pixel-shift, undersampling and interpolation can make undersampled images appear quite adequate. Elsewise the HVX-200 would look like the SD camcorder it really is. 

Anthony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insightful as always, Philip.</p>
<p>Oversampling is indeed useful. However, All the camcorder manufacturers have demonstrated how pixel-shift, undersampling and interpolation can make undersampled images appear quite adequate. Elsewise the HVX-200 would look like the SD camcorder it really is. </p>
<p>Anthony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Hodgetts</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/specs-lie-actually-they-just-mislead-us/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Hodgetts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/specs-lie-actually-they-just-mislead-us/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Great stuff as usual Anthony, however I&#039;ll make one comment on why 12 Megapixels for acquisition (even for less than 2 Mpixel displays): Oversampling at source is a good thing. The quality all down the line is better. This is why an inexpensive HDV camcorder outclasses much more expensive SD camcorders when in SD mode. The HD source is oversampled for SD display.

Oversampling at source is a very good thing. 

Your point about how misleading pure statistics are, is pure gold though.

Philip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff as usual Anthony, however I&#8217;ll make one comment on why 12 Megapixels for acquisition (even for less than 2 Mpixel displays): Oversampling at source is a good thing. The quality all down the line is better. This is why an inexpensive HDV camcorder outclasses much more expensive SD camcorders when in SD mode. The HD source is oversampled for SD display.</p>
<p>Oversampling at source is a very good thing. </p>
<p>Your point about how misleading pure statistics are, is pure gold though.</p>
<p>Philip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
