<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony&#8217;s HD1000u &amp; Panasonic&#8217;s DVC-60 &#8211; Seperated at birth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/</link>
	<description>Anthony's News, Reviews &#38; Perspective.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jinkop38</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>jinkop38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-229</guid>
		<description>I guess they had to maximise the r&amp;d cost of the hc7. If they had to include other ins and outs they should have gone back to the drawing board and delay everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess they had to maximise the r&amp;d cost of the hc7. If they had to include other ins and outs they should have gone back to the drawing board and delay everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony refreshes HDV line- HVR-S270 and HVR-Z7E &#171; I E B A Tech Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony refreshes HDV line- HVR-S270 and HVR-Z7E &#171; I E B A Tech Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>[...] interesting is that the HVR-HD1000 (u) is mentioned here. After numerous pictures and hands-on with the camcorder at a Sony press event in NYC, it looked like the MemoryStick slot (shown to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interesting is that the HVR-HD1000 (u) is mentioned here. After numerous pictures and hands-on with the camcorder at a Sony press event in NYC, it looked like the MemoryStick slot (shown to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ieba</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>ieba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>No. One CMOS chip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. One CMOS chip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stefan</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>is this a 3 chip cam?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is this a 3 chip cam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony’s HD1000u vs. Panasonic’s DVC-60 at FreshDV</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony’s HD1000u vs. Panasonic’s DVC-60 at FreshDV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 08:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] You can read the entire article at Anthony&#8217;s IEBA blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can read the entire article at Anthony&#8217;s IEBA blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ieba</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>ieba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>There is a stereo 1/8&quot; jack for audio input. Just no easy way to manually control the audio without an external box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a stereo 1/8&#8243; jack for audio input. Just no easy way to manually control the audio without an external box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 15:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Best overview of this camcorder I&#039;ve seen so far.  Sadly, it confirms some of my concerns about this unit.  I wonder... did Sony actually speak to any videographers before designing this camera?  I doubt it.  

I&#039;ve owned several Sony DV cameras, and they were/are some of the best in class gear.  Sony did some dumb things on these units.  A single VU meter on the VX2000 for example.  But what dunderhead forgot to include XLR inputs?  Even a separate 1&#039;8&quot; jack would have been of some help.  Are they so brain dead that the don&#039;t know event videographers need a way to plug in a wireless mic?  Apparently so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best overview of this camcorder I&#8217;ve seen so far.  Sadly, it confirms some of my concerns about this unit.  I wonder&#8230; did Sony actually speak to any videographers before designing this camera?  I doubt it.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve owned several Sony DV cameras, and they were/are some of the best in class gear.  Sony did some dumb things on these units.  A single VU meter on the VX2000 for example.  But what dunderhead forgot to include XLR inputs?  Even a separate 1&#8242;8&#8243; jack would have been of some help.  Are they so brain dead that the don&#8217;t know event videographers need a way to plug in a wireless mic?  Apparently so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony&#8217;s XDCAM-EX &#38; HD1000u &#38; more! &#171; I E B A Tech Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony&#8217;s XDCAM-EX &#38; HD1000u &#38; more! &#171; I E B A Tech Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ieba.wordpress.com/2007/10/03/sonys-hd1000u-panasonics-dvc-60-seperated-at-birth/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>[...] Lastly, another teaser, but I have more than 25 detailed photos of this baby in a new post: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lastly, another teaser, but I have more than 25 detailed photos of this baby in a new post: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
